Honourable Member of Parliament                                                   1st February 2015

Parliament House

Brisbane Qld 4000

                                                                             

By Registered Mail

With parliament being the lawmaker in our society and the ultimate custodian of our justice system, I am writing to you in your capacity as a member of parliament, and drawing your attention to an unheard of breach of conduct regarding the rules of the Court.

A Brisbane based Supreme Court Judge has relied on and broken centuries of Westminster Doctrine by invoking old statutory law over new statutory law.

I am conscious that I am making a serious allegation and I have therefore included with this letter the relevant section of the applicable law, so that you can determine if Justice Peter Lyons accepted an argument that the 1978 Town plan superseded the new 1987 City of Brisbane Town plan. 

If my claim is correct, I believe the integrity of our justice system is at stake. I have referred the matter to the CCC and their response is that they β€œDo not respond at all” Having exhausted all other avenues, I have now turned to you as ultimate custodians of our justice system – this unprecedented incident may well need to be addressed in parliament.

My request is simple: please verify if my allegation is correct.

If not, would you please writeme a short and honest explanation why my claim is false?

If true, how should this situation be rectified?

Yours Faithfully

Randolf Wirkus

Po Box 679

Kenmore Qld 4069

Enclosure:-

Summary of Case

Section 22B Power point presentation

Section 22B of 1978 City of Brisbane Town Plan

Letter to Premier cc Registered Mail CCC

Submission M Hinson SC 2 May 2012 claiming the 78 plan superseded all New Town plans

Original Judgment 2 April 2012 with erroneous advice page 4 clause 29.